[ANSTHRLD] conflict check please

[Robert Wade]

Daniel's identifiabilty point is a good one (My request to redraw the rings skirted around the issue - which is what I get for trying to reply during a lunch beak).
   
  Consider proposing "Vert, two annulets interlaced in fess Or between five cinquefoils argent"  (The default should be 3 and 2) if the number 5 is important or "Vert, two annulets interlaced in fess Or between three cinquefoils argent" (which is better style).
   
  Both seem clear.  The closest I came to a conflict was "Azure, two annulets interlaced in fess between three fish naiant Or."  There were no vert fields with both Or annules and argent secondary charges.
   
  Tostig

Robert Wade <logiosophia at yahoo.com> wrote:
  Conjoined is touching at a single point. Parker (Don't groan Daniel) lists rings without gems as annulets. They are "two annulets embraced Or",
although "conjunct", "linked together" and "interlaced fesswise" are alternatives.

Can the rings be drawn larger and the cinquefoils smaller? They secondary charges overshadow the primary charge group the way it's emblazoned.

Tostig

Lou Burgin wrote: 
Could you guys please double check me on this one. My blazon would be: 
vert two wedding rings conjoined or within five cinquefoils in annulo argent.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. AmberLea_______________________________________________
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org



---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
_______________________________________________
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org


       
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.