[ANSTHRLD] conflict check please

Lou Burgin lburgin at gt.rr.com
Wed Apr 18 16:20:20 PDT 2007


Thanks for all the good advice I will take it all to my client. I agree with 
the idea of at least redrawing the rings as annulets. I will approach the 
idea of some other main charge.  Thanks again.  AmberLea
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Wade" <logiosophia at yahoo.com>
To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." 
<heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] conflict check please


> Conjoined is touching at a single point.  Parker (Don't groan Daniel) 
> lists rings without gems as annulets.  They are "two annulets embraced 
> Or",
> although "conjunct", "linked together" and "interlaced fesswise" are 
> alternatives.
>
>  Can the rings be drawn larger and the cinquefoils smaller?  They 
> secondary charges overshadow the primary charge group the way it's 
> emblazoned.
>
>  Tostig
>
> Lou Burgin <lburgin at gt.rr.com> wrote:
>  Could you guys please double check me on this one. My blazon would be:
> vert two wedding rings conjoined or within five cinquefoils in annulo 
> argent.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. 
> AmberLea_______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org 




More information about the Heralds mailing list