[ANSTHRLD] Heraldic Heirs

Marie de Blois erminespot at gmail.com
Wed Feb 4 13:57:09 PST 2009


On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
> Marie de Blois <erminespot at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>  On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
>>  > Actually it is only kinda on subject, but I just had a weird question pop into my head.  Can a group create a heraldic will such that if the group ever goes defunct then it can will its armory to specified members of the populace or other groups?  Just curious.   I do know that by default if a group goes defunct that the name and armory reverts to the kingdom.
>>
>>  It couldn't - branch armory must have a laurel wreath, and individuals
>>  aren't allowed armory with laurel wreaths.  (as just recently upheld
>>  on the latest Cover Letter)
>
> No.  the branch DEVICE must have a laurel wreath.  Badges are also armory and do not have that restriction.  But If they can have a heraldic will I see nothing stopping them leaving their device to another group (other than kingdom which would receive it by default).

No need to be snippy - I misread 'device' where you wrote 'armory'.
Given that 'armory includes both devices and badges, it is still worth
noting that the branch -device- couldn't be transferred, even if
badges could be.

It would be interesting to see if Laurel would even accept such a
heraldic will, though personally, I'd think it was presumptuous and
tacky.  What's the harm in letting the kingdom hold onto them?  They
can't be released without some significant work.



Marie



More information about the Heralds mailing list