NR - Re: NR Principality
E.Preston III & Shelly K. Walker
wf3 at icok.net
Tue Mar 17 13:02:05 PST 1998
HL Estril wrote:
> Britta the Red asks:
> <If someother portion on Ansteorra manages to form a principality first,
> <would we still be interested?
> I don't think it should matter one way or the other. To my way of
> thinking, it's equivalent to, say, that the shire of Middleford might be
> elevated to a barony before the shire of Mooneschadowe is. The two
> really have nothing to do with each other. It should be the choice of
> the people directly involved that is the deciding factor.
Realizing that principality doesn't necessarilly mean "new kingdom", I
still would not care to see our beloved Ansteorra carved up into 2,3
or more principalities. I guess my basic question is "Why do we wish
to form a principality? What are the benefits? I know plenty of
gentles who pretty much play in their own backyard, being the north.
This will not change much whether we are principalitied (new word?) or
I guess I do see this as much bigger than Baronial elevations. Whereas
I would be thrilled to see Mooneschadowe become a barony, the effect
on Gnomon Vale would still be minimum. Obviously, the effect of a
principality in the north would greatly effect us all.
Britta the Red
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Northern