[Sca-cooks] Not at all food related meta issue

[Lord Pooky]

Greetings,
I subscribe to the sca-cooks list in digest form.
I do not get the opportunity to invest enough time to read all the posts.
I was at that moment in time again, to see whether I need to receive emails 
from this list anymore.
I said to MYself " Well I'll read a post and see if I need to be here ".

Gunthar I read your post. I'll be waiting to see what if anything you type 
in the future. Thanks for reaffirming MY desire to be on this list and for 
justify-ing MY resolve to continue in this " Game ".

I appreciate you,

Pooky of Namron - Participant in the SCA for 29 years


Do your shopping and make your DREAM at Poppa Pookie's Plentifully 
Pleasurable emPorium!!!
Get your Education at Pukhta Lovvek's University of Empathy and Learning 
Center of Loving Thought!!!
Our Motto: "Love Vivificates THE~DREAM"


>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:03:17 -0500
>From: "Michael Gunter" <countgunthar at hotmail.com>
>Subject: [Sca-cooks] Not at all food related meta issue
>To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
>Message-ID: <BAY104-F39EFC91C2B6EB667AE8904DFBA0 at phx.gbl>
>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
>Well, this whole discussion has been amusing and a bit academic.
>The Society is just that, a society. Any sociologist will tell you that
>group dynamics tend to follow certain trends and it doesn't matter
>if it is governments, families, villages, weird reenactment groups
>or biker gangs.
>Any position of leadership is a position of power, no matter how
>nebulous that power is. From the President of the US to the
>dungeon master, some are very good, some abuse it and many
>will gain that power at all costs.
>
> >So what's wrong with requiring SCA crowns to be charming and gracious?
> >They're 'paid' with praise, attention, gifts, crown-bunnies, etc.
>
>There are several requirements to be Crown, often these are
>loopholed and overlooked by contenders. If solid requirements
>are overlooked, the rather esoteric graces can be quickly forgotten.
>There are no checks and balances for good behaviour within our
>Society other than your reputation. For many people reputation
>is secondary to rank.
>
> >Historically, *every* crown was good enough to enough people for enough
> >time...at least for a while.  Again, I don't think anybody is promoting 
>the
> >idea of cruel, hateful, rude, abusive crowns in the SCA.  That's a bad
> >marketing strategy.  It's a sanitized view of Medieval life, so why not
> >simply have a sanitized form of Medieval kings?
>
>Well, I think I beg to differ on this point. I guess I can agree with
>you that "every" crown was good enough for the people simply
>because he had an army that made sure everyone liked him. And
>the peasants of the time, like the general public now, really
>didn't care one whit who was King as long as he left them alone
>to live their own lives.
>
>There are several Royal Peers subscribed, myself being one of them
>so maybe we can give a better perspective about what sitting in
>the Big Chair is all about.
>
>The number one thing to remember is that nobody is a villan in their
>own mind. When you become the Crown all of a sudden you get to
>do the stuff you have always dreamed of the King doing in the SCA.
>And often you think you are doing the best job you can. For some
>people all they care about is winning the list and getting the title
>and having people bow and scrape to you. Unfortunately you also
>have to run the State, make sure you don't piss people off, attend
>tedious meetings, be nice to people you don't like, and basically BE
>the head of state. Many of the people who only want the title have
>a hard time with this. Funny, often the same thing happend with
>real life power grabbers too. For every bad SCA Crown I can point
>to a Caligula, Nero, Ivan, Nixon, etc...
>
>The power of SCA Crowns is true power, it may only exist in our
>little group but it is nonetheless power. Why do people bow and
>scrape to me because I won a tournament 5 years ago? Why do
>guys who are total nerd losers in real life have ladies wanting to
>have sex with them because they have a shiny hat? We change
>policy and affect the lives of thousands of people with our actions.
>With any power comes the opportunity to either use it or abuse
>it. Fire is a very good thing. It heats our huts and cooks food and
>converts iron to steel. It also burns, hurts, kills and destroys. Like
>power, it is how it is used. And you can't tell fire to "be nice" you
>have to control it. Some Crowns truly believe in what we do and
>work their tails off to be what everyone wants a King and Queen
>to be. Some Crowns want stuff, and babes and respect and the
>opportunity to give stuff to their buddies and to hell with those
>pansy rapier fighters or artisans or archers because we don't play
>their game.
>
>Guess what? That happens with elected leaders, real world Kings
>and CEOs.
>
>We cannot force good behavior on our Crowns, we can only
>encourage it and pray something sticks.  Being Crown is a major
>pain in the butt as well. You are on call 24/7. Everything you do
>is commented upon, shoot people know when you go to the
>bathroom. Everyone expects you to solve their problems, you get
>blamed if it rains! You have to arrange courts, attend every meeting,
>handle problems, make constant decisions and try to look good doing
>it. Some do it better than others and if it looks like they had an
>easy reign it only means they kept the nasty stuff from getting out.
>
>As far as alternate Crown Tournaments go, there have been a couple.
>An Tir tried it once, it was determined a lot of fun and very interesting
>and never do it again. There was the Principality list that was mentioned
>earlier.  And there may have been others. I know groups like Amptgard
>have Wars where people gather warbands to fight and I don't think
>their leaders have been any different from any other system.
>
>Personally I look at Crown Tournament as a series of battles, my personal
>skill is the "army" I was able to build. The tournament is a scaled down
>"War of Roses" in which armies are destroyed and assimilated until it's
>down to two commanders who have climbed to the top of the heap.
>In war, you are never quite sure who's head will have the circlet and
>who's will be on the block.
>
> >Do anything to embarrass the organization and you're out, determined by
> >some committee or the BoD.  You want to avoid bad behavior?  Identify it
> >ahead of time and explain the consequences.  New example comes up?  Add 
>it
> >to the consequences explanation.
>
>Oh, Lordy! I can just imagine the squirrel cage that would be. The
>problem is that we often have "morals" discussions about members
>but all too often there are 50 different sides to the argument. The
>ugliest Crown that I've ever seen was when the two fighters in the
>Final had to win at all costs, "to save the kingdom from the other".
>
>Honor and reputation are the only coins that really matter within the
>Society. You an have all the rank in the world, have every award and
>still get no respect from anyone if your behavior was that bad. There
>have been a couple of dukes given lifetime banishments because of
>their actions. Getting respect is the only thing that really matters
>and respect only comes from your behavior.
>
>Perhaps there could be a clause that the people decide if a Crown
>who steps down be given Royal rank. But that could be a lot of
>fun to do as well.
>
> >You seem convinced that your fellow SCA members will back-stab, lie, 
>cheat
> >& steal in order to gain victory at any price.  I'm just not willing to
> >accept that.
>
>Unfortunately, it does happen. Not as often as it seems to be because
>of the fact that we talk about that more than the good ones.  But,
>yeah, people will lie, cheat and manipulate to gain even our pretend
>power. A hell of a lot more actually believe in this game we play and
>make it worth being here for. It's for those that this Society has
>grown and thrived for 40 years!
>
> >Duriel
>
>Gunthar
>
>
>