'Unofficial Feast' - was Re: [Sca-cooks] Wines at a Feast **The NewPolicy**

[grizly]

I personally believe that Bear has hit the proverbial nail-head squarely in
discussing Corporate liabilities.  Policy and Procedures are all about
establishing the Corporate shield and the boundaries of Corporate
culpability/protection.  The primary purpose and intent is to protect the
Corporate interests from legal liability in the case of lawsuit.  The
probable next value is to establish a set of expected behaviors and
procedures for members of the body corporate.

Should an individual choose to behave or make decision contrary to legally
established and published P&P, then they are on their own and without the
Coprorate Shield and attorneys to protect themselves and their private
assets.  Their may be additional internal ramifications for continued
flaunting of said P&P . . . because if the Coporation ignores such repeated
behaviors, then they expose themselves de jure to liability due to consent
to the 'renegade' behaviors.

At its core, this is legal protaction of SCA, Inc.  The next layer is
establishing the expected behaviors of legal representatives and officers of
SCA, Inc.

niccolo

-----Original Message-----
Is that meant, then, as a CYA or loophole?

So that if a group actually does buy & serve wine at a feast, the feast
therefore, by definition, is not an official SCA event?

What would the actual or possible sanction be against a barony or shire,
for example, that 'dared' to buy & serve wine at a feast if, since it
would then no longer even be an official SCA event?
<SNIP>

Duriel  >>>>>>>>>>