[Sca-cooks] Bread Puzzles
JIMCHEVAL at aol.com
JIMCHEVAL at aol.com
Mon Feb 1 17:46:24 PST 2016
In a message dated 2/1/2016 4:44:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ddfr at daviddfriedman.com writes:
Then you add to it 3 lbs 2 oz of water (does
"refraichir" imply water?),
I'm,pretty sure it does. Liebaut explicitly uses it in that sense at one
point.
explains why the numbers add up. Could "pour le levain mestre" (or
nestre--the printing is unclear) mean something like "for the leavening
master," referring to what is going to be made by combining leavening
and water?
That makes sense to me.
. What didn't go
through is very heavily bran (checking a modern source, 79 pounds of
wheat should give about 12 pounds of bran), so no use for baking.
Not necessarily. The poor quality bread could be VERY poor quality. A
statute from another region describes the local bread as “coarse dense poorly
baked, heavy and little risen”.
The
other half, which is a mixture of flour and bran, you put aside for
other uses.
In fact, that is usually what made up the middling quality of bread.
Combine 10 pounds of old dough for leavening with 3 pounds 2 ounces of
water, put 10 1/2 lbs of the mix into the white flour, the rest into the
good dark flour.
My own guess is that all the direct instructions are meant to apply only to
the good white bread (the object of the test). Everything else is put
aside to be processed separately. But that's only a guess.
Jim Chevallier
Contributor, Savoring Gotham
A Food Lover's Companion to New York City
Editor-in-chief: Andrew F. Smith and Foreword by Garrett Oliver
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/savoring-gotham-9780199397020?cc=us&
lang=en
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list