SR - Principality Preps Task Group
Dennis and Dory Grace
amazing at mail.utexas.edu
Fri Jun 5 13:24:53 PDT 1998
Salut Cozyns,
Lyonel aisai.
Mistress Meadhbh says:
>My statement had nothing to do with the size of the committee. You can
have one
>representative from each group. All I want to see is that person represent
the group
>NOT their personal interests no matter what it is. This does not
necessarily mean the
>committee member has voting power.
I know Aquilanne has sent a few messages offering clarification of what she
sees as the duties and responsibilities of the proposed principality task
group, but I think we need to hear some clarification from the other end of
this discussion. I mean, hey, maybe we're missing something.
So, for Mistress Meadhbh or Timo (or anyone else who wants to take up these
questions): why *should* the proposed task group include appointees from
each involved barony and shire? I mean, since the group will have no
actual decision-making powers, what would representation accomplish? Can
you describe a theoretical situation in which a shire or barony might
somehow miss out or lose something for *not* having a rep in the task group?
lo vostre por vos servir
Sir Lyonel Oliver Grace
============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Southern
mailing list